Now I am preparing a list of documents for filing an application for registration of an invention.
To properly submit an application for an invention, you need to prepare a description, come up with and describe the formula and abstract. The content of these documents, like the formulas, is strictly regulated, so I may need help here.
The first thing I don’t understand is the task of writing the name of the invention, which should show the purpose of this device. For example, I can write “one-finger cursor control.” From this text I find other already registered inventions, the descriptions of which are completely different from what I came up with. Question: can different inventions have the same names and become a reason for refusal to register my invention?
When describing the level of technology, it is necessary to explain to the FIPS expert in as much detail as possible that such a method of controlling cursor movement with existing tools (such as a mouse, touchpad or trackball) does not exist. And in my invention there is such a way to control the cursor. If my invention, as an option, makes it possible to use part of the cursor control method that is already working in our time, then the next question arises. Can the closest analogue of my invention be a basis for refusing to register the invention?
More and more questions are being asked, and the ones asked here are just the beginning. I am fully confident that my invention will truly allow you to control your cursor quickly and accurately. The fact that you can easily and comfortably position your hand and palm further increases my confidence in the quality of the invention.
I would be very grateful for answers to my questions.
Comments